Sample Collaborative Practice Agreement For Nurse Practitioners Texas

Dr. Alton explained with a moving note: “I would have opened an independent practice when I was younger, but the supervisory issues and the amount I had to pay for a doctor for this service stopped me.” How many other NPs in Texas have been prevented from setting up clinics because of these free and expensive rules? Now it`s time to have a full training instance nationwide. Has there ever been a time when you felt constrained by TX`s NP practice laws? According to the Texas Nursing Practice Act, NPs must have received written approval from a prudential physician for the “prescriptive delegation,” also known as the collaboration agreement. In addition to the TX Board of Nursing, NPs are also regulated by the TX Board of Medicine. What is remarkable is that recently, TX has finally eliminated the requirement that a doctor be on site for the NPs to be beautiful at all times, and the fight continues. Dr. Cara Young – the assistant professor at the University of Texas, Austin, who graciously agreed to be interviewed for this article – recommended in 2014 a study entitled The Impact of Nurse Practitioners on Health Outcomes of Medicare and Medicaid Patients. Dr. G.M. Oliver, Chief Investigator, found that states with the power of practice for NPs actually had lower hospitalization rates and improved health outcomes. The study stressed that barriers to overall APRN practice should be removed to improve Americans` access to quality and affordable health care, especially among undertreated patients. Yes, I would have opened an independent practice when I was younger, but the supervisory issues and the amount I would have to pay for a doctor for that service stopped me.

Right now, I am in emergency care and I have to meet with my cooperating doctors once a month, which takes time for them and me; It`s a waste of our time. Given the inevitable shortage of health care providers in Texas and the abundance of evidence that NPNs provide quality and inexpensive services, it is disappointing that this struggle for independence continues. Highly qualified and certified NPNs are limited by costly cooperation agreements with physicians; They are denied the opportunity to prescribe treatments independently and to make decisions about the care of their patients. There is limited evidence that this additional bureaucratic burden actually protects patients; on the contrary, clinically disenfranged NPNs can have negative consequences. In Texas, limited practice conditions are particularly worrisome due to the looming shortage of primary supply providers across the country. The Association of American Medical Colleges (April 2016) projected a deficit of between 14,900 and 35,600 primary care physicians in the United States by 2025; According to a 2013 AAMC report, Texas is even worse than in most states and ranks 42nd in the country`s 100,000-population rate. NPs in Lone Star State and other regions are well trained to meet the health needs of an aging and growing population, particularly in rural areas where the population is underserved. In fact, 89 per cent of NPs are federally trained to work in primary procurement. And despite the abundant evidence that NPNs offer safe and resource-efficient health services, Texas NPs cannot legally work within the scope of their capabilities. I think this is an important step towards improving access to quality health care, especially for the uninsured and underinsured, as well as for those living in rural and border areas.

Comments are closed.